THE NATURE OF THE UNIVERSE

When we speak of axioms refer to truths that are self-evident. This concept is repeated from ancient times up to now. Mathematicians and logicians work with them by their status as truths indisputable, becoming the base and foundation of the development of these sciences. Always struck me as strict of the claim regarding the axioms. "The obvious truth that does not need demonstration". For me, used to seek the explanation of things, talk that exhaustively seemed a heresy. The benefits obtained from use can not be discussed. But we must find the justification that is back. There remains therefore the question of its origin, where it comes from so much power and because it is up to us as an inexplicable mental inlay. When we find the source we will be enabled to specify its scope and its limitations. Historically the axioms put in dire straits to the partisans of the experience as a source of knowledge. To be able to not explain them as originating from that sourc

Talk about the importance of God to man seems foolish if we do not establish certain premises that help sustain a substantial argument.  We must not forget that the question seeks to a conclusion and this requires several considerations. The point of view that I will develop dispenses with religion, I will not count with classic resources that come from this worldview since my biggest desire is to unwrap adjusted to a judgement of reason. Route of the reason that I choose, the first question is whether or not there is the object on which I am going to discuss.  Does God exist?  The response should be positive if I want to continue, otherwise here would end this attempt.  I know an answer and I should be able to defend it if it ignites a controversy.  If, I know a positive response, it is the same one that I proposed some time ago already in this blog with the same title. Is that God exists, note the reader that I don't say "I think".  I say it because I am c